What Challenges Would Need to be Addressed for Esports in the Olympics

Esports, or competitive video gaming, is an industry that has been rapidly growing in popularity worldwide. With this rise in popularity has come a discussion about the merits of including esports events in the Olympics. In recent years, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and other governing bodies have held talks about adding esports to their official lineup of games.

However, many challenges would need to be addressed before esports could join the ranks of Olympic sports. This guide examines the potential challenges that may arise when considering inclusion of esports into the Olympic Games and how they would be addressed. Such topics include fairness across competing teams and athletes, regulations on age restrictions and team selection process, and international collaboration between various nation’s competitive electronic gaming organizations. Additionally, the guide explores some of the obstacles specific to hosting an esports event during or prior to an Olympic Games such as technical difficulties associated with broadcasting events and developing rulesets that govern different types of team compositions or competitions internationally.

Should Esports be in the Olympics Pros and Cons

The growing popularity of esports in recent years has made it an attractive proposition for becoming part of the Olympics. Adding esports to the Olympics would bring a whole new audience to the sport, with many new and exciting possibilities. In this article, we will talk about some of the pros in having esports be a part of the Olympics.

Increased Exposure

Esports has grown rapidly in the past decade to the point of being recognized by some countries as a legitimate mind sport. It is estimated that the global esports industry will reach $1.65 billion by 2021. As experts note, if esports were officially part of the Olympic Games, it would provide additional exposure and help further legitimize virtual sports around the world.

Included in this increased exposure would surely be recognition from sponsors and increased presence for investors, all of which would help accelerate growth for professional team organizations around the world. As a result, game developers could not only bolster their own sales with more investment and revenue from sponsors but also receive more widespread public attention through millions of people tuning into tournaments worldwide. Furthermore, competitors could benefit from attractive prizes and incentive programs as well—creating an environment that promotes healthy competition and encourages motivation for players across multiple disciplines of esports alike.

Global Reach

The Olympics bring with it an incredible amount of attention from viewers across the world. As a result, adding esports to the Olympic program could potentially increase the global visibility of esports and help close the gap between traditional sports and esports. This heightened awareness could be used as a tool to introduce these traditionally niche gaming communities to a larger audience and promote diversity, inclusivity, and equal opportunity in the industry.

Furthermore, by including esports in the Olympics, fans would have access to content which was not previously available – increased exposure across the world would drive further competition, expanding potential avenues for growth. Teams and players will have more opportunities to earn success and fame within their respective games which may manifest itself in more substantial sponsorship deals from major companies looking to promote their brand through highly-visible international tournaments.

Adding esports into an already established system like the Olympics helps legitimize video games as sport. Esports’ acceptance into Olympic programming helps carve pathways for future generations of gamers that can play their favorite video games at an international level – something which was once thought almost impossible.

Increased Revenue

The inclusion of esports in the Olympic lineup could be an effective tool for driving increased revenue from broadcasting rights, sponsorships, and merchandise. Esports tournaments attract a large global audience, with recent numbers being upwards of 400 million people around the world. This opens up a huge potential to tap into this massive fan base and create lucrative new sources of income for the Olympics. Additionally, given how much money is now being poured into esports every year from sponsorships and live tournaments, there would certainly be an increase in investment across media outlets looking to broadcast events related to the Olympics. Such increased viewership could also lead to more sponsorship opportunities for brands looking to capitalize on this trend.

Finally, the sheer number of viewers means that there would almost certainly be a spike in sales of official Olympic merchandise featuring teams and players participating in these particular athletic events. All these factors make it clear that including esports in the Olympics would bring significant new sources of revenue to this prestigious international event.

Cons of Esports in the Olympics

With the rise of esports in recent years, the debate has emerged regarding whether esports should be included in the Olympics or not. There are many pros to this idea, however there are also some cons that should be taken into account. In this article, we will focus on the cons of esports in the Olympics, and the challenges that need to be addressed in order to make it a successful inclusion in the Olympics.

Lack of Physical Activity

Esports are a rapidly growing industry with many passionate players and fans, but there is one major disadvantage of e-sport inclusion to the Olympics – lack of physical activity. Traditional Olympic sports require physical exertion and coordination from athletes. Even when physical stamina is not the most important measure of success in an Olympic game, athletes still have to be physically fit in order to compete at the highest possible level. Esports are much more reliant on reaction time and mental skills than physical prowess; as a result, lack of physical activity would negatively affect the Olympics as a global sporting celebration.

Furthermore, by having esports as an official competition in the Olympics would mean that there have to be other non-typical athletic activities take part in multidisciplinary events such as boxing, swimming, track and field etc., As a result, it may lead to other issues such as gender representation issues since currently most popular esports games involve mostly male players or even anti-doping regulation violations for performance enhancing drugs and doping substances. Additionally, esports also faces allegations around cheat codes that involve software or hardware manipulations which could provide players with unfair advantages over their competitors during some high stake matches. All these factors need to be taken into consideration before eSports can become part of future Olympics worldwide.

Lack of Standardization

The lack of standardization is seen as one of the biggest obstacles in introducing esports into the Olympic Games. The esports industry is at an early stage of development and there isn’t any clear consensus about what types of games should be included in the Olympics, the rules that should be followed, or who should be responsible for managing the competition. On top of that, different countries have different legal frameworks related to gaming, making it difficult to agree on a common set of rules. As an example, some countries allow video games with violent content while others forbid it completely.

Another challenge when it comes to standardization is that there are objectively no world governing bodies in place with authority to make decisions on behalf of all international tournaments. Furthermore, many esports communities have their own sets of rules and regulations when it comes to selecting tournaments and players for competition, meaning that even if a centralized body was established, there would still need to be considerable effort put in order to create a global set of standards accepted by all parties involved.

Finally, many gamers prefer competing online over attending physical events due to cost and comfort factors. This makes establishing standardized formats extremely difficult since most existing formats are designed for online play and may not comply with the regulations required by Olympic authorities.

Lack of Oversight

A major issue with esports in the Olympics is the lack of oversight from governing bodies. Esports are primarily organized by companies or independent promoters, and many games lack a governing body with structure and regulations. Without higher-level organization, the Olympic Committee would have to devise new rules for esports and develop a comprehensive set of standards for participation — something that has had mixed results in other sports such as snowboarding and BMX biking.

Another issue is safety — there are physical dangers associated with taking part in some popular video games such as first-person shooter (FPS) games and racing simulations that can lead to injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome. To protect participants, Olympic officials would have to create rules and regulations specific to each game. This could also lead to accusations that esports don’t merit inclusion in the Olympics due to their perceived lack of physical skill; however, research has shown that professional players perform certain physical movements more quickly than non-professional players due to improved cognitive processes.

Finally, some Olympic sports already require strict uniform guidelines based on gender, but this would not be possible in some popular computer gaming genres where characters may not be easily identifiable by gender or another protected class. This creates an inherent conflict between traditional notions of fair play and current cultural norms related to diversity and inclusion — one which the International Olympic Committee would need to address carefully if it were ever considering allowing esports into its program for worldwide competition.

Challenges that Need to be Addressed

As eSports continues to gain traction and recognition, many have speculated whether the genre should be included in the Olympic Games. While on paper it certainly appears that this could be a great way to enhance the Olympics, integrating eSports into the Olympics would come with its own unique set of challenges. In this article, we’ll explore the pros and cons of adding eSports to the Olympics, and the associated challenges that need to be addressed before it can become a reality.

Establishing Standardized Rules

The lack of unified and standardized rules associated with esports makes it difficult to ensure fair and consistent competition. Considering the numerous game titles, each game has its own set of rules, which can vary between different tournaments. Having guidelines that are not well established could lead to confusion among players. The International Esports Federation (IESF) has approved a set of standard rules in 2018 that applies to all main titles such as Dota 2, League of Legends and Starcraft II; this is intended to ensure a level playing field for all competitors.

However, additional challenges need to be addressed in order for esports to have a greater presence within the Olympic Games, such as establishing a recognized platform for tournament organization and competition, refereeing protocols across multiple platforms, broadcast standards on a global scale as well as educating Olympic Committees on both the sport and its athletes. All these elements are essential for providing an appropriate portal for esports into the Olympics – ultimately allowing it to gain the recognition it needs from fans around the world.

Addressing Issues of Cheating

One of the major challenges that need to be addressed in order for esports to be taken seriously and even be considered for inclusion in the Olympic Games is the issue of cheating. Cheating can come in many forms, from game-altering software programs, such as hacks and trainers, to more easily accessible moves such as game-shifting mouse macros – hidden commands which can allow players to gain an unfair advantage. This is of particular concern because modern games often rely on a teamwork element between players or teams, meaning that even if one or two individuals use a hack or macro, other players may suffer due to their malicious behavior.

In order to address this challenge, international esports organizations have taken steps, including forming anti-cheat regulatory bodies and deploying dedicated servers with verified and consistent hardware configurations. These practices help ensure that cyber security protocols are consistently followed in order for players and teams alike to trust the outcome of matches.

Additionally, anti-cheat bodies are able to monitor online activities during tournaments by involved parties; implementing penalties when necessary as a result when a player is found breaching these rules through any form of cheating. It is through these measures – ultimately aimed at maintaining trust within the esports community – that have allowed esports events the credibility needed before further discussions on its potential inclusion into mainstream sporting events like the Olympics can take place.

Establishing Consistent Judging Criteria

In order to ensure fairness and competitiveness, there must be an established system for judging esports finalists. Judgement should be based on a combination of accumulated points, tournament wins, rankings and other criteria that may vary according to the game. Criteria should also specify key elements such as character selection, strategies used, teamwork and overall performance that determine a winning team or individual. All details should be well defined before a tournament begins so that competitors know exactly how they are being evaluated.

At the same time, establishing standardized criteria will require close collaboration between esports game publishers and Olympic officials. When establishing winning conditions there needs to be recognition of technical challenge levels and players’ personal form in order to ensure fairness within the competition environment while also making sure that only competent players advance in each round. Along with this comes a need for effective communication between organizers and participants ahead-of-time so that everyone is aware of rules, format & regulations. Finally qualified judges should have received official training on scoring players according to these criteria for accurate results which can inspire trust from participating spectators & eSports fans around the world in its legitimacy as an Olympic event.


It is clear that esports would be a difficult, yet exciting addition to the Olympics. There are many concerns that need to be addressed in order for esports to become an Olympic-sanctioned event. These include regulation from current governing entities, equipment access, gender equity and inclusion, broadcast production, and player support and compensation.

Each of these challenges needs to be taken on by individual nations, governing bodies or committees in order for esports to truly embrace the Olympic spirit and be introduced as a legitimate event in the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games. The world of esports is expanding rapidly with more fans each year. It is time to recognize video gaming as a legitimate sport that can have its own place amongst the majestic sports featured at the Olympics.